At 68% salary, would those employees not be better off on paro? For the first two years anyway...
And for most people, certainly in my case, 68% of my salary wouldn't even cover all my bills and loan repayments, let alone allow me a sneaky spend on some actual food!
And presumably, whilst employees are retained at 68% salary they are not at liberty to look for other jobs. Even if they weren't generally considered too old to get one. And they're on track for a lower pension.
I don't like it. Not at all...
Edit: Not to mention that the remaining full-time employees will be having to work longer hours under more pressure to cover for the missing staff - without any extra compensation in their wage. I should know. My co-cashier was made redundant and then the bank merged with Banesto, doubling the cash desk volume whilst halving its staff.. Since then I have been doing the work of not two, but at least three people. Am I paid any more for that? Am I fuck.